South Sudan says renewing arms embargo is ‘anti-peace’
President of South Sudan Salva Kiir Mayardit |
The Security Council
voted Thursday in favour of extending sanctions against South Sudan until May
31 2020.
It includes an arms
embargo, asset freezes and travel bans on some officials over their role in the
country’s civil war, now heading towards its sixth anniversary.
Information Minister Michael Makuei said the arms blockade only benefited
rebels who had refused to sign a peace deal last September aimed at ending a
conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions.
“Any arms embargo at
the moment is an anti-peace measure,” Makuei told AFP.
“There are people who
do not want peace in South Sudan… All this is done in order to weaken the
government so that it can be overthrown by the opposition.”
Makuei referred in
particular to the rebel group of former South Sudanese General Thomas Cirillo
Swaka, who has been leading the National Salvation Front since 2017, fighting
the government army in the country’s south.
The US-drafted
Security Council resolution was adopted by a vote of 10 in favour with five
abstentions.
Resolutions in the
15-member council require a minimum of nine votes for adoption.
The three African
countries on the council — Equatorial Guinea, Ivory Coast and South Africa —
refused to support continued sanctions, arguing it would not push the country’s
rivals closer to peace.
The US criticised the
three, saying they had shown “an unwillingness to stop the flow of weapons to
one of the continent’s deadliest civil conflicts.”
Under the September
peace agreement, President Salva Kiir agreed to set up a unity government with
longtime rival Riek Machar, who is to return from exile.
The accord — which was
not signed by Cirillo or former army chief Paul Malong — provided for the
formation of a power-sharing transitional government by May 12, but that
provision has been delayed by six months.
Post a Comment